Explained| Burden of proof: Criminal Proceedings versus Departmental Proceedings
The two proceedings, criminal and departmental, are entirely different. They operate in different fields and have different objectives.
Continue reading
The two proceedings, criminal and departmental, are entirely different. They operate in different fields and have different objectives.
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The bench of R. Subhash Reddy* and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has held that reinstatement with full back wages is not
Continue reading
“The power cannot be exercised in a casual and cavalier manner.”
Continue reading
Supreme Court: In a case where a man was convicted for killing his wife on the suspicion of her infidelity and was
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The bench of KM Joseph and S. Ravindra Bhat*, JJ has reiterated the factors to be considered while deciding the
Continue reading
Supreme Court: In a case where a woman had sought compassionate appointment after her mother’s death in the year 2012, the bench
Continue reading
“A claim to refund is governed by statute. There is no constitutional entitlement to seek a refund.”
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The bench of L. Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai, JJ has, in two judgments, has held that where the plaintiff’s
Continue reading
Supreme Court: In a case where the assessee had not kept their interest free funds in separate account and as such had
Continue reading
“… in taxation regime, there is no room for presumption and nothing can be taken to be implied.”
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The bench of L. Nageswara Rao v. BR Gavai*, JJ has set aside the judgment of the Aurangabad bench of
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The bench of UU Lalit and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has held that such persons whose place of origin/domicile on or
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The bench of UU Lalit and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has referred the question as to whether there would be a
Continue reading
“Though we have all the sympathies with the students, we will not be in a position to do anything to protect the admissions, which were done in a patently illegal manner.”
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The bench of Hemant Gupta and AS Bopanna, JJ has held that in order to determine whether a document is
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The division bench of RF Nariman* and BR Gavai, JJ has explained the object and scope of Explanation 3C of
Continue reading
Supreme Court: In a case where the detenu was accused of committing a series of criminal offences from October, 2017 to December,
Continue reading
Supreme Court: In the case where the Governor of Haryana had directed compulsory retirement of an Additional District and Sessions Judge after
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The bench of Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy*, JJ has held that the Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable to
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The bench of Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy*, JJ has held that the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development
Continue reading