Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Single Judge in order dated 16-07-2024 held that there are enough documents proving that appellant had started construction on Virar property even though there is a status quo order, and thus, to safeguard and preserve the property, a Court Receiver needs to be appointed.

Continue reading
Uttaranchal High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The right to life and liberty is one of the integral part of the Constitution and it is the most sacred fundamental right and the custody of people in the name of various enactments and without adhering to the promptness of the investigation, cannot allow appellant to remain under incarceration.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Respondents have not shown any active role of petitioner in the capacity of the promoter, in the management of the company, Shrenuj, and any role and obligation factually fastened on petitioner in the various compliance which are required to be undertaken under SEBI (LODR) Regulations, at the time of freezing of his demat accounts.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Section 115 of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 stated that a person who tried to commit suicide, enjoyed a statutory presumption about mental stress and having regard to such presumption, is excluded from being put on trial.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The circular dated 30-01-2024 issued by the State of Goa, does much more than just informing the public of the provision of Section 52(1)(za) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and interfered with the enforcement mechanism provided in the Act for exercise or enforcing rights of copyright societies under the Act.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Although HSBC has initiated the proceedings before the Court in UAE, seeking orders to pay the amount under the facility letters and to obtain a decree, ARF SV 1 Sar-applicant is entitled to pursue the claim in execution in the Courts in India by filing the Execution Application.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Though petitioner’s parents have supported her sister’s decision to stay with Respondent 1 and his daughters due to her state of depression after losing her husband and daughter in the accident, this cannot be a consideration for this Court to consider that petitioner’s sister is the biological mother of petitioner’s daughters merely because she is the egg donor.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court opined that Regulation 10 permitted only Fellow Members to apply for Certificate of Practice because Fellow Members possessed higher qualifications than Associate Members by passing additional examinations and there is not only an intelligible differentia between Associate Members and Fellow Members but there is a rational nexus to the object sought to be achieved by the said classification.

Continue reading