Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

After applying the definition of Railway as defined under the Railways Act, 1989, to the contract between the petitioner and RVNL, it would constitute that the work specified under the contract is the original work pertaining to railway for the purpose of the subject notification and thus, covered under Serial No. 3(v)(a) of the notification dated 28-06-2017 issued by Central Government.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“There are no cogent reasons or circumstances that have been established by the authorities to the satisfaction of the judicial conscience of the Court, that the disability suffered by the cadet was neither attributable nor was aggravated on account of military service.”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Although the general rule is that a Criminal Court lacks jurisdiction to recall its own orders, it cannot be ignored that the dismissal of the anticipatory bail application of the accused persons occurred in circumstances that warranted reconsideration.”

Continue reading
Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that it failed to understand how the respondents could have retained the amounts deposited by the petitioner at the time of preferring the appeal and seeking stay of demand, after the appeal is decided, and matter is remitted back, and fresh assessment order is passed.

Continue reading
Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

On literal interpretation of Section 115(1) of Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, it can be stated that any person who attempts to commit suicide shall be presumed, unless proved otherwise, to have severe stress and cannot be tried and punished for any offences under Penal Code, 1860.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The jurisdictional parameter about failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment are missing and without compliance with the said parameters, the respondents have no jurisdiction to proceed with the reopening of the assessment.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

While this court does not fault the Trial Court for attempting to proceed with the trial expeditiously, but, denying to the petitioner (‘accused’) the right to cross-examine the Head Constable on an issue which is critical to his defence appears to have been a disproportionate sense of expedition.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The victim has left her parents’ house without informing the parents and stayed with the accused for 3 days and 3 nights, she also confessed that she was in love with the accused and travelled along with him to different places and had a consensual encounter.”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is noteworthy that instances of cyber fraud are increasing day by day, and according to the Data maintained by the Reserve Bank of India, Rs 3207 Crores were lost due to 5,82,000 cases of cyber-fraud between F.Y 2020 to F.Y. 2024.”

Continue reading
Gujarat High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The pain and agony of a five-year-old child, who became paraplegic, is miserable, at least in the form of money, but sense prevails that it is the only occasion on which the Tribunal or the Court by adopting a pragmatic, realistic, and sensible approach to compensate the minor and/or to endeavour to put him back to the original position.”

Continue reading