Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The mental trauma faced by patients and their families due to delays in insurance approvals is widely recognized. While this frustration may justify claims for compensation for mental harassment, it does not constitute a criminal offense.

Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Amounts of retiral dues, including gratuity, are not bounties. It is deferred payment to the employee for the long services rendered by him to the Department… The retiral dues are also recognized as property under the Article 300-A of the Constitution.”

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Even otherwise Section 67 of the IT Act is for obscene material and not for provocative material. The words “lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest” mean relating to sexual interest and desire, therefore, Section 67 IT Act does not prescribe any punishment for other provocative material.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The present case has once again brought to light, the distressing reality that victims of sexual assault, particularly those who are minors and come from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds, often remain unaware of the appropriate legal forum to approach, or the procedure to be followed, in cases involving termination of pregnancy resulting from sexual assault.

Continue reading
Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The respondents cannot take a stand that since the petitioner did not serve during the period, on the percept of ‘no work no pay’ his pay was fixed notionally to enable him to get pensionary benefits. The said contention of the respondents is untenable and unsustainable in the eye of law.”

Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Regularisation of admission, subject to payment of Rs.1 lac fine from each student for the lack of diligence, would meet the ends of justice and may operate as a scarecrow for the future students to remain cautious and careful, while getting admissions.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The grievance in the petition was that the Bar Council of India (BCI) had prohibited the petitioner from practicing law without following the required disciplinary procedure under the Advocates Act, 1961. The petitioner argued that the BCI’s order was issued without conducting a proper inquiry or providing an opportunity to present evidence, thereby violating principles of natural justice.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Honey trap typically involves an individual, often an intelligence agent, who assumes a false identity and cultivates a relationship with the target. Such a relationship is built on the foundation of trust and intimacy exploiting the target’s vulnerability and desires.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The cut-off date is meaningless and/or is redundant, it is neither based on any intelligible differentia nor it has any nexus with the objective sought to be achieved, inasmuch as, the unauthorized constructions over an unauthorized colony being permissible to be compounded, thus only within the arena of the stipulations as made in the apposite notification/rules/building byelaws.

Continue reading