National Human Rights Commission
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The National Human Rights Commission recently called State Human Rights Commission Tamil Nadu and other authorities to act upon the dilapidated condition of District Child Protection Office, Royapuram.

Continue reading
NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal observed that an application under S. 12A cannot be entertained after approval of Resolution Plan by CoC.

Continue reading
CESTAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

CESTAT states that cancelled flat bookings amount to non-performance of service,Held that Service tax is not applicable if no service is rendered.

Continue reading
ATE
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal stated that since the first test report was deficient, it did not stand legal scrutiny and was directed to treat the second test report as the first test report in continuation of their investigation.

Continue reading
National Green Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NGT constitutes High Level Committee to be headed by Lieutenant Governer, Delhi to combat unabated pollution caused in River Yamuna and directed to adhere to the timelines laid down.

Continue reading
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“The request of Saya Cementations to be the promoter of the project along with Alisa Infratech to comply with all the pending and forthcoming obligations jointly and severely under the rules and regulations of the RERA Act was accepted by the Authority”

Continue reading
NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: While deciding an appeal filed against the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order imposing a

Continue reading
NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

In the instant matter, an appeal was filed challenging NCLT's order directing the CoC to reconsider its decision. Upholding the NCLT's order, the Tribunal held that when the CoC's decision for liquidation is in accordance with IBC, then only NCLT's obligation to direct liquidation will arise.

Continue reading
NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

In instant matter, the appellants filed an appeal challenging the NCLT order approving the Resolution Plan approved by the CoC. The NCLAT held that once Resolution plan is approved by CoC, it cannot direct modifications of claims to Resolution Plan as the Tribunal does not have residual equity-based jurisdiction.

Continue reading
NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal stated that if the withdrawal of the Section 9 Admission order was upheld and CIRP were to start afresh from the date of admission of the Section 7 Application, it would have resulted in an inadequate insolvency resolution of the corporate debtor.

Continue reading
National Green Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal stayed the operation of notification issued by MoEF&CC modifying the EIA regime in respect of construction projects with built up area more than 20,000 sq. meters to 50,000 sq. meters and industrial sheds, educational institutions, hospitals and hostels for educational institutions more than 20,000 sq. meters upto 1,50,000 sq. meters.

Continue reading
NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

In the present case, a Liquidator filed an application before for release/refund of unlawful payment by the applicant. The Tribunal, partly allowing the appeal, upheld the refund of the amount of Rs.25,46,588/- and of the amount of Rs.1,08,797/- as no application for refund was filed for the said amount.

Continue reading
NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT while deciding the appeal held that the CoC after approving the resolution plan cannot seek direction from Adjudicating Authority to consider the new resolution plan of a third party who was not a part of the CIRP as it would fall outside the timeline and defeat the very scope and objective of the Code.

Continue reading
CAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

    Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi: In an original application filed by the applicant seeking to quash the answer key for Questions

Continue reading
NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

In the instant matter, the Adjudicating Authority dismissed S. 7 IBC application on the ground of limitation and the Tribunal acknowledged that there was default and debt, and the application is not barred by limitation.

Continue reading
CESTAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The supply of ISO Tankers on lease/rental basis by foreign suppliers to the appellant would amount to a ‘deemed sale’ under Article 366(29A) of the Constitution as the appellant throughout had effective control and possession over the ISO Tankers.

Continue reading
Central Information Commission
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

A combined reading of the provisions of the RTI Act and the observation of the Supreme Court crystalizes the interpretation and meaning of the word ‘information’ as defined in the section 2(f) of the Act which only refers to such material as is already available in the records of the public authority.

Continue reading
National Green Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

It was alleged that less than 50 meters of distance between Veeranam Lake and the proposed petrol pump violated the addendum of 16.08.2021 to the guidelines of 7.1.2020 issued by the Central Pollution Control Board.

Continue reading
NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

    National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: A bench consisting of Anant Bijay Singh, J., and Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member)

Continue reading
NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

In the case at hand, a buyer of an apartment in a DLF Project had allegedly found several clauses of the buyer-seller agreement reflecting abuse of dominance position by DLF which was “highly unfair and discriminatory” to the buyer.

Continue reading