Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a public interest litigation filed by an Advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi, practicing

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Warner Bros. Entertainment Limited (‘plaintiff') seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Hamdard National Foundation (India) (‘plaintiff 1′) and Hamdard Dawakhana (‘plaintiff 2′) relating to the

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a trademark infringement suit filed by a company namely, Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt Ltd. (‘plaintiff’) running a

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Sunshine Tea House Pvt Ltd. (‘plaintiff’) for its brand CHAAYOS was seeking permanent injunction

Case BriefsHigh Courts

There cannot be a surgical separation of the word and it would be an overall impression of the mark that would be considered.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a case filed by CROSSFIT gym (‘Plaintiff’) having CROSSFIT trademarks seeking permanent injunction against defendant gym using the

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a petition filed by association of shopkeepers dealing in sale, purchase and storage of kite flying materials including

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (‘A&C Act') challenging

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Livspace Pte. Ltd. (‘plaintiff 1') and Home Interior Designs E-Commerce Private Limited

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by producers’ (‘plaintiff') of the film ‘Brahmastra Part One: Shiva' seeking permanent injunction

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In an application filed by the applicant who is a UP Police official, charged under Section 302,

VISTARA
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Tata Sia Airlines (‘plaintiff') seeking decree of permanent injunction against company selling

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Infringers cannot be permitted to seek shelter under Telegram’s policies merely on the ground that its physical server is in Singapore. If the protection of copyright is not evolved as per the changing times, it would have a chilling effect on the progressive initiatives taken by educators in sharing their materials and ensuring accessibility.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a case where Dominos IP Holder LLC, popularly known as Dominos (‘plaintiff’) was seeking protection of the mark

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: On a question of law before the Court that whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) erred in law

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case pending for 5 years before Court, the parties finally reached compromise and sought quashing

Rouse Avenue
Case BriefsDistrict Court

    Rouse Avenue District Courts, Delhi: In a case relating to illegal interception/monitoring of telephone calls of National Stock Exchange ‘NSE'

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a case filed by a woman alleging rape charges under Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) and Protection of Children

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a case seeking grant of medical termination of pregnancy by a 16-year-old rape victim (‘petitioner’), Yashwant Varma J.,