Rajasthan High Court

Appointments & TransfersNews

Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava to be the Acting Chief Justice of Rajasthan HC on retirement of Justice Akil Abdulhamid Kureshi

President appoints Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, senior-most Judge of the Rajasthan High Court, to perform the duties of the office of

Appointments & TransfersNews

Justice Birendra Kumar of Patna High Court transferred as a Judge of Rajasthan High Court

President transfers Justice Birendra Kumar, Judge of the Patna High Court as a Judge of the Rajasthan High Court. Ministry of Law

Appointments & TransfersNews

Justice Satish Kumar Sharma of Rajasthan HC transferred to Madhya Pradesh HC

Transfer Notification President transfers Justice Satish Kumar Sharma, Judge of Rajasthan High Court, as a Judge of Madhya Pradesh High Court. Ministry

Appointments & TransfersNews

Two Judges appointed to Rajasthan High Court

Appointment of Judges | Rajasthan High Court Two Judges appointed to Rajasthan High Court: Kumari Rekha Borana Sameer Jain Ministry of Law

Appointments & TransfersNews

A Judicial Officer, An Advocate and A Judge | Read Appointment and Transfer Order

President of India, in exercise of the power conferred by clause (l) of Article 217, Article 224 and Article 222 of the

Appointments & TransfersNews

3 Advocates and 2 Judicial Officers appointed as Judges of Rajasthan High Court

President appoints the following Advocates and Judicial Officers as Judges of the Rajasthan High Court and directs them to assume charge of

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Chairman of party who entered into arbitration, can he be categorised as eligible under Arbitration and Conciliation Act? SC highlights impartiality of arbitrators as a key element while pronouncing this ruling

Supreme Court: Expressing on the aspect of independence and impartiality of the arbitrators, Division Bench of M.R. Shah and Aniruddha Bose, JJ.,

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Raj HC | According to Law of Precedence, judgment passed by Coordinate Bench binding, whereas judgment of other High Court has persuasive value; transfer order once executed cannot be cancelled, altered or modified

Rajasthan High Court: Dinesh Mehta, J., allowed a petition which was filed challenging the order whereby petitioner’s transfer order dated 28-07-2021 had

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Raj HC | Judgments cited by the applicant cannot be made basis as a precedent to infer that the balance of convenience always lies in favour of the wife; Transfer petition allowed

Rajasthan High Court: Rameshwar Vyas, J. allowed the transfer petition and transferred the matter to the Family Court, Ajmer.  The instant transfer

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Raj HC | “Live-in relationship cannot be at the cost of social fabric of this country”; Police protection rejected to a live-in couple

Rajasthan High Court: Satish Kumar Sharma J. dismissed the petition and rejected police protection to a couple. The instant petition was filed

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Raj HC | Addressed plight of kith and kin of missing person; Instructions/guidelines to be adopted by the police officials in the State of Rajasthan laid down

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Sandeep Mehta and Manoj Kumar, JJ., disposed of the petition, observing that the missing person

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Raj HC | “The investment made by State for construction of Dams is made redundant if natural flow of water is impeded in any manner”; directs State to take necessary steps

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ and Vinit Kumar Mathur, J., direct State to inform them regarding steps

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Raj HC | In circumstances of death while on duty, can ex-gratia be allotted as per both unamended and amended rules? Court answers

Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., allowed a writ petition which was filed aggrieved by an impugned order which dealt with

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Raj HC | Whether third child born on account of failure of ligation operation a reason to deny grant ACP by a blanket order? Court answers

Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., allowed a petition which dealt with the issue as to whether the third child born

Case BriefsHigh Courts

[Compassionate Appointment] Raj HC | Denial of compassionate appointment on fathering third child? Court analyzes Rules of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servant

Rajasthan High Court: Dinesh Mehta, J., dismissed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the denial of compassionate appointment by communication dated

Case BriefsHigh Courts

MP HC | Rape accused of live-in partner granted anticipatory bail; Court directs “shall not move in the vicinity of prosecutrix”

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Anand Pathak, J., granted anticipatory bail to the applicant who had filed the application apprehending arrest in respect

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Raj HC | Declaration of journalist as front line health workers a ‘policy decision’; Court dismisses appeal

Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench of Sabina and Manoj Kumar Vyas, JJ., dismissed a petition which was filed by way of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Raj HC | Society cannot determine how individuals live their lives, especially when they are major, even if the relationship seems unsocial; Court issues directions safeguarding life and liberty

Rajasthan High Court: Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J., decided upon a petition which was filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Raj HC | Whether candidates who did not study ‘Language’ as an optional subject in their 3-year degree course studied it later as an additional subject post completing graduation be eligible to the post of “Language Teacher”

Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench of Sabina and Manoj Kumar Vyas, JJ. dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order. Facts

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Raj HC | Primary objective of parole is to facilitate family ties being maintained and cannot be rejected on flimsy grounds

Rajasthan High Court: Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. allowed the petition and sets aside the impugned order. The facts of the case are