stamping of arbitration agreements
Experts CornerSwarnendu Chatterjee

by Swarnendu Chatterjee† and Megha Saha††

unstamped arbitration agreements
Experts CornerVasanth Rajasekaran

by Vasanth Rajasekaran †
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 38

validity of unstamped arbitration agreement
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The practice of dissent in judicial decision-making process plays a critical role in revealing constitutional commitment to deliberative democracy. Allowing judges to express differing views and engage in a dialogue about the law and its interpretation can potentially lead to a more nuanced and refined understanding of the law, as the Court grapples with competing interpretations and seeks to reconcile them in a principled manner.

Conflict of Laws
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Mayank Singh†

Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Constitution bench considered a question of law : whether the instrument was duly stamped or not, was not only contrary to the plain language of Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration Act, but also wholly defeated the legislative intention of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, and puts a spoke in the wheel of conduct of the arbitration process at its very inception.

Case BriefsSupreme Court

    Supreme Court: The division bench of Uday Umesh Lalit, C.J. and Bela M. Trivedi*, J. has held that the provisions

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Panasonic India Private Limited (petitioner) seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes which

Case BriefsSupreme Court

When Section 7 or any other provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 do not stipulate any particular form or requirements, it would not be appropriate for a court to gratuitously add impediments and desist from upholding the validity of an arbitration agreement.

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Priyanshu Shrivastava† and Fatema Kinkhabwala††

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Calcutta High Court: In a petition challenging the appointment of sole Arbitrator by the respondent, Shekhar B. Saraf, J., held

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Calcutta High Court: While deciding a review petition, Debangsu Basak, J. held that the court while exercising powers under Section

Experts CornerSwarnendu Chatterjee

by Swarnendu Chatterjee† and Dhriti Bole††
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 58

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: A very interesting question was considered by G.S. Kulkarni, J., the question being, whether mere filing of a proceeding

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., expressed that the issue of whether in the absence of a third party, the refundable security

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., decided that mere use of word ‘Arbitration’ in the heading of an Agreement would not mean

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a case where the bench of Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka, JJ was deciding an issue relating to

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: SR Krishna Kumar, J., disposed of the petition and directed the petitioner-company to avail such remedies as available in

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court: Noting the significance of Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Jayant Banerji, J., expressed

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J., allowed an arbitration petition by appointing a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the contesting parties.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Amit Bansal, J., dismissed a petition challenging the order passed by the lower court whereby respondent’s application under Section