The conundrum in seeking Interim reliefs for foreign seated arbitrations in India
by Sushmita Gandhi*, Anamika Singh** & Bhargav Kosuru***
arbitration and conciliation act
Appointment of arbitrators under Section 11 by the Supreme Court: A time intensive phenomenon
by Payal Chandra* & Rhythm Buaria**
Stamping of Agreements vis-à-vis Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996
by Yakshay M. Chheda* & Ishan J. Ravindranath**
Post Award Interim Reliefs under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: A light at the end of the tunnel
by Alabh Anant Lal* & Soham Banerjee**
Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Award in India: Developments
by Byron Sequeira* & Dhruv Srivastava**
Amended Section 8 of A&C Act does not inundate entire regime of special legislation in non-arbitrable cases: SC
Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of Uday U. Lalit and Ashok Bhushan, JJ. dismissed a review petition filed against Supreme Court’s judgment dated
Principles of CPC can be looked at for guidance while deciding matters under Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996
Uttaranchal High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manoj K. Tiwari, J., dismissed a bunch of writ petitions filed against the
Arbitration application dismissed on grounds of territorial jurisdiction
Uttaranchal High Court: An application for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was dismissed
Adjudicatory proceeds arising out of arbitration liable to be dismissed where settlement reached by way of mediation
Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Gita Mittal, Actg. CJ and C. Hari Shankar, J., disposed of an appeal under
Appointment of arbitrator by Court under S. 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act explained
Karnataka High Court: While deciding a civil petition under Section 11(6) and (8) read with Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation
Mandate of Arbitrator to be terminated if there is undue delay in dispute resolution process
Madhya Pradesh High Court: In three separate writ petitions, the termination of the mandate of the Arbitrator and the appointment of a
An arbitral award can only be set aside if is contrary to the contract between parties, against the law of the land or is against public policy
Delhi High Court: The Court elaborated on Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 while dismissing an appeal
Petition under S. 9 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act can be filed only before the civil court of original jurisdiction
Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a civil miscellaneous petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
Notice under S. 21 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is mandatory to initiate arbitral proceedings
Delhi High Court: Petitioners appeared before the Delhi High Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to challenge the
Amendment to Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to have retrospective effect on pending post-award court proceedings
Bombay High Court: In the case where Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) challenged both the arbitral awards ordered against it,
Mere allegation of fraud simplicitor may not be a ground to nullify the effect of arbitration agreement between the parties
Supreme Court: Explaining the scope of Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Bench of Dr. A.K. Sikri and