![](/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/MicrosoftTeams-image58-390x293.jpg)
Article 226 of the Constitution of India
![](/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/MicrosoftTeams-image58-390x293.jpg)
![](/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/MicrosoftTeams-image34-391x293.jpg)
Quashment of FIR/Charge-sheet in Light of Exoneration in Departmental Proceedings: Settled or Unsettled Law
by Shruti Awasthi† and Arpit Singh††
![Patna High Court](/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/patna-high-court-440x293.jpg)
Pat HC | Non-disclosure of previous termination from same department of Intelligence Bureau is a highly sensitive piece of information, valid reason for cancellation of candidature
Patna High Court: A Division Bench of Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ and Ashutosh Kumar, J. disposed of the writ petition since no
![Uttarakhand High Court](/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/uttrakhandHC-440x293.jpg)
Utt HC | Courts not to sit in judgment over decision of competent authority in imposing stringent punishment
Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and N.S. Dhanik, J. contemplated a writ petition filed in pursuant to
![](/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/MP-high-court1-440x293.jpg)
MP HC | Unfounded political allegations cannot be settled in a Court of law
Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of S.K. Seth, CJ and Vijay Kumar Shukla, J. declared that a publicity maneuvered petition
![Jharkhand High Court](/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Jharkhand-High-Court-440x293.jpg)
Court not to act as expert in education matters; candidature shall be better judged by respective authorities: Jharkhand HC
Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed a petition as it was out of their domain