Fork in the Road: The Curious Case of Bifurcated Jurisdiction in Indirect Tax Appellate Structure
by Tarun Jain†
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 28
by Tarun Jain†
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 28
Karnataka AAR said that there were two transactions involving the applicant. The first transaction is of supply of goods by the manufacturer to the applicant and the second transaction is of supply of the same goods by the applicant to an overseas customer.
Karnataka AAR said that transfer of ‘staffing business’, in sale of independent running business division, amounts to “supply of services” and not “supply of goods” under Sections 2(52) and 2(102) of CGST Act.
The Gujarat AAR ruled that the PVC foot mats used in cars are classified under CTH 8708 and attract 28 percent GST
The practice and procedure, both pre and post GST are consistent and involve participation of the officer of the DGGI in issuance of show cause notices.
Madars High Court said that truth will come out only when the petitioner appears before the respondent pursuant to the summons received by him and not otherwise. Further, held that if it is the same subject matter, the State Authority cannot prosecute the petitioner once again as the Central Authority has already initiated action against the petitioner in respect of the very same subject matter
KAAR ruled that input tax credit must be availed in terms of Section 16, 17 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 42 of CGST Rules, 2017.
Allahabad High Court adjourned the tax writ of Paytm’s parent company, will decide the issue that whether the supply of mobile recharge coupons and DTH recharge vouchers to recipients, who are in other States, would be interstate supply or intra-state supply.
On 26-12-2022, the Ministry of Finance has notified the Central Goods and Services Tax (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2022 to amend
Delhi High Court: In a case filed questioning whether the cumulative sum of Rs. 1,80,10,000/- deposited on behalf of the
The 48th GST Council has made recommendations relating to changes in GST tax rates, measures for facilitation of trade and
It suffered from non-application of mind and was in violation of mandatory requirement of section 75 (6) of the CGST Act.
The Authority said that as the applicant entered into agreements with TSIICL for execution of contracts of buildings, warehouses, godowns , and TSIICL in turn let out the godowns for its customers on rent which amounts to use of the constructed premises for the purpose of business, thus, tax will be applicable at the rate of 9 percent CGST and SGST each.
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (Maharashtra): In an appeal filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Services Tax
Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling: The two-member bench Milind Kavatkar and Amit Kumar Mishra has ruled that Goods and Service
Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Loreal India Private Limited (petitioner) challenging the order dated 23-06-2022 passed by
Telangana High Court: While allowing the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for quashing the
Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling: T.G. Venkatesh, Additional Commissioner, and K. Latha, Joint Commissioner held that concerning vessel support services provided
Madras High Court: Anita Sumanth, J. set aside the impugned order which rejected a registration application filed under Section 22
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Punjab: Arun Narayan Gupta Chief Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, and Kamal Kishor Yadav, Commissioner of State