Restriction on Layering of Companies: Should We Go Back to the Drawing Board?
by Prerana Priyanshu† and Jishan Dediwal††
Companies Act
Entitlement of Dissenting Financial Creditors under IBC
by Vikas Mehta†
2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2
CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 — R. 54(14)(b) — Family pension: Although Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act entitles widow of a government servant
[Lulu v. Coolulu] | Karnataka High Court directs Regional Director, Corporate Affairs to pass a fresh and reasoned order in the trademark dispute
In Lulu v. Coolulu trademark dispute, the Karnataka High Court chided the competent authority for not considering the nuances of the dispute properly, which meant that the impugned order did not show even a semblence of application of mind.
Delhi High Court upholds bail granted to the former director of BPSL Aarti Singhal in Bhushan Steel scam
Delhi High Court observed that in absence of any cogent, supervening circumstances necessitating cancellation of bail of the respondent/accused, the Court cannot merely cancel the bail so granted.
20th Surana & Surana National Corporate Law Moot Court Competition 2022-23
JSS Law College, Autonomous, Mysuru and Surana & Surana, International Attorneys cordially invite you to compete in the 20th Surana & Surana
Tribunals have no authority to issue instructions determining dress code for appearance of Advocates: Madras High Court
Madras High Court reiterated that wearing “gown” is only optional and not mandatory before any Courts other than the Supreme Court or the High Courts. Thus, it held that the order of the National Company Law Board imposing a dress code for Advocates for appearance before the Tribunal is without authority and hence, illegal.
To Compel or not Compel, Moving the Debate of Mandatory Shareholder Arbitration to India
by Tushar Behl† and Shreshtha Garge††
The Intersection between Arbitration and Insolvency Proceedings: An Indian Perspective
Devna Arora* and Didon Misri**
Does Civil Court have jurisdiction to determine title of shares issued ‘fraudulently’? Calcutta High Court examines
Calcutta High Court | Krishna Rao, J., held that under Companies Act, 2013, Civil Courts have jurisdiction to enquire into
Supreme Court accepts SEBI’s apology and drops contempt proceedings against it
In a matter relating to criminal proceedings against Reliance Industries, SEBI had failed to comply with the Supreme Court’s order directing it to furnish a copy of documents, leading to initiation of contempt proceedings against SEBI.
2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 2
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 14(1)(a) and 2(1)(e) r/w Ss. 11(5) and 11(6) — Application seeking termination of
The Clean Slate Theory – IBC’s Version of Hermione’s Obliviate Spell
by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 83
2022 SCC Vol. 9 Part 5
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 7, 8 and 11 — Essential requirements of arbitration agreement: When there is discernible intention
Calcutta High Court | ROC can initiate multiple/ parallel proceedings upon discovery of additional material warranting inquiry under Section 206 of Companies Act
Calcutta High Court | While dismissing a writ petition challenging the capacity of Registrar of Companies (ROC) to initiate multiple/
Green Finance and Environmental Governance
by Kritika Krishnamurthy† and Tapasi Mohapatra††
Failure of Director to contradict allegation of contract of purchase from the Company can only fasten liability for the alleged amount but cannot lead to forfeiture of his office of Director: SC
Supreme Court: In a case where the appellant challenged the forfeiture of his office of Director for allegedly entering into a contract
Differentiating Between Statutory vis-à-vis Contractual Charge Holders – Relevance During Liquidation – Analysis
by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 81