Companies Act 2013 Archives | Page 2 of 2

MP HC | In absence of any offence punishable under Companies Act, Special Court doesn’t have jurisdiction to try the case which is punishable under IPC

Madhya Pradesh High Court: S.K. Awasthi, J. dismissed the petition on the ground that trial court and not Special Court are competent

OP. ED.Practical Lawyer Archives

Compliance Checklist for Passing of Resolution by Circulation

Gaurav N Pingle, Practising Company Secretary, Pune

Cite as: (2019) PL (CSP) June 66

Legislation Updates Rules & Regulations

MCA notifies National Financial Reporting Authority (Meeting for Transaction of Business) Rules, 2019

G.S.R. 377(E)—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (10) of Section 132 read with Section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT | AIOVA’s appeal against CCI Order exonerating Flipkart and Amazon of antitrust violation allegations to be heard on 30th July

National Company Appellate Tribunal: A Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Kanthi Narahari, Member (Technical) admitted

Legislation Updates Rules & Regulations

Central Government notifies Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules, 2019

G.S.R. 273(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 133 read with Section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013),

Case Briefs Supreme Court

Provisions of I&B Code must prevail over Section 434 of Companies Act if there is any inconsistency: SC

Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of R.F. Nariman and M.R. Shah, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the order of Rajasthan High

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

No reduction in fine imposed under Section 92(5) of Companies Act as Directors not disclosing their accounts: NCLAT

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial)