Service rendered at no matter how less consideration would still be a ‘service’ under Consumer Protection Act
Supreme Court: The bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has held that a construction worker who is registered under
consumer protection
District Forum can’t extend limitation period of 45 days for filing response under Section 13 of Consumer Protection Act
Supreme Court: The 5-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, MR Shah and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ has held that
Series of significant “Bills” passed in the 1st Session of Parliament after General Elections 2019 [Full List]
The First Session of the Parliament after the 2019 General Elections, the most productive session in the longest time was conducted. In
#World Consumer Rights Day, 2019 — Consumer is the King!
by Devika Sharma†
Centre to submit comprehensive status report on compliance of Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Supreme Court: After a 3-member committee headed by former Supreme Court judge, Justice Arijit Pasayat, filed it’s report on the facilitating infrastructural
Trust cannot file a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Supreme Court: The bench of Madan B. Lokur and P.C. Pant, JJ held that a Trust cannot file a complaint under the
Union Government directed to frame model rules for implementation of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Supreme Court: Showing concern over the deficiency of infrastructure in the adjudicatory fora constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the 3-judge