![](/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/yellow-440x293.jpg)
contract
![](/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/yellow-440x293.jpg)
![](/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Bombay-HC-440x293.jpg)
Bom HC | Stamp duty cannot be avoided on arbitration agreement, even if the rest of the contract is executed outside state
Bombay High Court: G.S.Patel, J., held that an arbitration agreement must be stamped in the state where the arbitration is to take place,
![](/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Bombay-HC-440x293.jpg)
Bom HC | Dishonour of a cheque issued as a mere guarantee does not attract punishment under S. 138 NI Act
Bombay High Court: K.R. Shriram, J., dismissed a criminal appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the accused was acquitted
![Punjab and Haryana High Court](/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court-440x293.jpg)
P&H HC | No substantive issue raised when parties at consensus to resolve the matter with the competent authority
Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of Krishna Murari, C.J and Arun Palli, J. disposed of the writ petition after
![](/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Supreme-Court_Colour-440x293.jpg)
Clauses stipulating ‘deposit-at-call’ before invoking arbitration defeats the purpose of ADR process
Supreme Court: In the case where a Notice Inviting Tender had a clause asking the parties invoking arbitration to furnish a “deposit-at-call”
![Uttarakhand High Court](/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/uttrakhandHC-440x293.jpg)
Utt HC | State can choose lead contractor in a composite contract based on nature of work
Uttaranchal High Court: The Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. stated that if the major part of the work was of civil nature
![Supreme Court of The United States](/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/supreme_court_of_US-440x293.jpg)
SCOTUS | Court cannot override the arbitrability clause in a contract
Supreme Court of the United States: The appeal lies before the Bench of Kavanaugh, J. The facts of the case were such
![](/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Bombay-HC-440x293.jpg)
Relationship, by itself, does not prove extent of interest of candidate in contract under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Panchayats Act
Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of S.B. Shukre, J. dismissed a petition filed challenging the orders of Collector, Gadchiroli
![](/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Delhi-HC-440x293.jpg)
Bank Guarantees are separate contracts not bound any other contractual relations between parties
Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ravindra Bhat and A.K. Chawla, JJ., dismissed a First Appeal against an order declining
![](/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/DSC_5487-440x293.jpg)
Property developer has to respect the contractual commitment so that the people who dream of houses can repose faith in him
Supreme Court: Stating that a property developer has to respect the contractual commitment, the 3-Judge Bench of Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy and
![](/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Supreme-Court_Colour-440x293.jpg)
Disputes between Government Owned Corporations should not go through long expensive trials but be quickly resolved by way of Arbitration
Supreme Court: Considering the sad state of affairs of long drawn expensive and cumbersome trials to resolve disputes between two Government owned