![(2022) 6 SCC J-1](/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/MicrosoftTeams-image-6-440x293.jpg)
Error
![(2022) 6 SCC J-1](/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/MicrosoftTeams-image-6-440x293.jpg)
![Punjab and Haryana High Court](/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/punjab_and_haryana_high_court-440x293.jpg)
Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing
Punjab and Haryana High Court: Fateh Deep Singh, J., dismissed a review application on the ground that no mistake or error was
![](/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/MP-high-court1-440x293.jpg)
MP HC | Cancellation of candidature on the ground of typographical error arbitrary and grossly disproportionate; Court allows petition
Madhya Pradesh High Court: Pranay Verma, J., allowed a petition which was filed praying for a direction to consider petitioner’s candidature for
![](/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/CESTAT-Taxscan-440x293.jpg)
CESTAT | An arbitrary show cause notice which is held to be correct in principle cannot become a ground to re-open a case under guise of rectification of mistake
Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellant Tribunal (CESTAT): A Division Bench of Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) and C.L. Mahar (Technical Member) dismissed
Raj HC | ‘Casual errors lead to unnecessary burden on Court’; error permitted to be rectified subject to deposit of cost
Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Arun Bhansali, J., allowed the application filed to seek corrections, however, the Court ordered the applicant
![National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission](/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/NCDRC_-440x293.jpg)
Rehearing of issues not allowed in cases of review but Commission may interfere where there is an apparent error in the order
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Single Member Bench of Prem Narain (Presiding Member), partly allowed a review petition filed against
![](/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/orissa-high-court-440x293.jpg)
If an error committed by any authority is timely rectified by it, then no irregularity or illegality can be attributed to it
Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr B.R. Sarangi, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the notification which had
![Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court](/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/JK-High-Court-440x293.jpg)
Non-seriousness of injuries inflicted by the accused on the victim should not be the sole criteria for framing charges against the accused
Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed a petition filed under Section 561-A of
![Canada SC](/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/supreme_court_of_canada-440x293.jpg)
No error by Trial Judge in addressing witness’s refusal to answer; convictions restored
Supreme Court of Canada: This appeal was filed before a 5-Judge Bench comprising of Wagner, CJ. Abella, Cote, Rowe and Martin, JJ.,
![](/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Delhi-HC-440x293.jpg)
Cancellation of candidature of an IIT Qualified engineer at the final stage of induction into Civil Services held disproportionate to bonafide omission
Delhi High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Rekha Palli and Hima Kohli, JJ., allowed an appeal and set aside the order