delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court observed that in the present case, the natural resource viz. natural gas was neither ‘bought’ nor ‘sold’ as between Reliance and the Ministry; thus, the public trust doctrine was not contravened.

stamping of arbitration agreements
Experts CornerSwarnendu Chatterjee

by Swarnendu Chatterjee† and Megha Saha††

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Prashant Tripathi† and Sanjeev Singh††

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court held that the petitioners are not entitled to join respondents 3 to 5 as parties to arbitral proceedings, as they do not qualify as “alter egos” of the first respondent or as successors-in-interest.

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Shivaprakash M. Nagarale†

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Simran Pahwa† and Yasha Goyal††

Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: A Division bench of Ritu Raj Awasthi, CJ., and Suraj Govindaraj, J. issued notice to the respondent and listed

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: While addressing the issue related to jurisdiction of Court under Section 11(6) of the A&C Act, the 3-judge Bench comprising

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Mikhail Behl*

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Hiroo Advani† and Manav Nagpal††

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Vibhu Bakhru, J., held that the scope of interference with an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration

Op EdsOP. ED.

by M. Rishi Kumar Dugar*