appointment of arbitrator
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court said that whether any particular facts constitute a cause of action has to be determined with reference to the facts of each case and with reference to the substance, rather than the form of the action. If an infringement of a right happens at a particular time, the whole cause of action will be said to have arisen then and there.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court observed that an ex parte decree of divorce also it shall be lawful for either party to the marriage to marry again if no appeal is filed against such decree within the period of limitation.

Meghalaya High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Meghalaya High Court said that there is no limitation on the powers of the Governor in conferring a part of the authority pertaining to the Penal Code or some special law, to a particular Court or officer appointed in that behalf.

Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Supreme Court was unimpressed with the explanation given by the plaintiff for the delay of 853 days that he initially fell sick with Jaundice and was later confined to house with High Blood Pressure, Diabetes and other diseases. The petition had extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration of Rs. 15,00,000/-.

NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

While dismissing the appeal challenging the order of Adjudicating Authority which dismissed a S. 7 IBC application on the ground of want of limitation, the Tribunal held that there is no question of going into the merits of the case and the application is barred by limitation.

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court held that the petitioners are not entitled to join respondents 3 to 5 as parties to arbitral proceedings, as they do not qualify as “alter egos” of the first respondent or as successors-in-interest.

NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

While adjudicating an appeal file with a delay of 55 days, the Tribunal held that S. 238 IBC overrides S. 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and therefore this Tribunal does not have power to condone a delay beyond a period of 45 days.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: In a petition filed by Gammon Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd. under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996

Akaant MittalExperts Corner

by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 8

Case BriefsDistrict Court

Vikrant J. recorded that when the benefit of two ACPs was granted to the plaintiff after the completion of 10 and 20 years of service respectively, there is no justification for not granting him the benefit of 3rd ACP after the completion of 30 years of satisfactory service before retirement.

NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

In the instant matter, the Adjudicating Authority dismissed S. 7 IBC application on the ground of limitation and the Tribunal acknowledged that there was default and debt, and the application is not barred by limitation.

Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court while dealing with the issue of limitation for filing claim petition, considered the months and not days from the date of accident, for calculating the limitation period.

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court held that the contempt petition is not maintainable and barred by limitation. Thus, dismissed contempt proceedings against the presiding officer of Family Court as he was not the presiding officer when the order was passed.

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Madras High Court: In a criminal original petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Panasonic India Private Limited (petitioner) seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes which

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by the petitioner challenging dismissal order in relation to an application filed seeking

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Extramarks Education India Private Limited (petitioner) seeking appointment of an arbitrator to

Case BriefsSupreme Court

“A claim may not be barred by limitation. It is the remedy for realisation of the claim, which gets barred by limitation.”

Case BriefsSupreme Court

    Supreme Court: In a suit for specific performance the Division Bench of Indira Banerjee* and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ., explained the

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“The purpose of looking into the records of the lower fora in revision is principally to see whether any jurisdictional error or material irregularity has been committed, which has to be judged by seeing their orders in the light of the evidence and material placed before them i.e., the material which they were privy to when they passed their orders”