delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court observed that the defendant has used the infringing mark ‘BETNOL’, which is identical to the plaintiff’s mark ‘BETNESOL’ with the intent to springboard its business by drawing association with the plaintiff and its trademark to ride on the goodwill and reputation of the mark of the plaintiff.

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Mridula Bhat†

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Yashvardhan Rana†
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 29

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR): The Bench of Sydney D’Silva and Parthasarathi Dey (Members) addressed an application sought on the