delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Many inventions in emerging technologies including by SMEs, start-ups and educational institutions can be in the field of business methods or application of computing and digital technologies, therefore, there is a need to reconsider the exclusions in Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, 1970, in view of the growing innovations.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The mistake of the patent agent would be similar to the mistake of an advocate who may be representing parties in any

COVID 19Op EdsOP. ED.

by Shruti Prasad Dhonde

Supreme Court of The United States
Case BriefsForeign Courts

Supreme Court of The United States: While deciding the patent dispute between Minerva Surgicals and Hologic Inc., the Court made certain significant

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Saransh Chaturvedi*

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: C. Hari Shankar, J., after a wholesome discussion, rejected the idea of the constitution of a “two-tier” Confidentiality Club

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Akash Kumar Prasad & Khushboo Agrawal*

Op EdsOP. ED.

Vaishali Singh, Assistant Professor of Law, School of Law, University of Petroleum and Energy Sciences

Cite as: (2019) PL (IPR) July  91

Supreme Court of The United States
Case BriefsForeign Courts

Supreme Court of United States: While determining that whether the ‘inter partes review’ established under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act violates Article

GNLU
Op EdsOP. ED.

 Vidya Dadati Vinayam, Vinaya Dadati Paatrataam I Paatratva Dhanamaapnoti, Dhanaat Dharmam Tatah Sukham II This shloka in Sanskrit means true/complete knowledge gives