What Comes First After the Award: The Relief or the Stay? A case comment on Sepco Electric Power Construction Corpn. v. Power Mech Projects Ltd.
by Prerona Banerjee† and Vishal Sinha††
by Prerona Banerjee† and Vishal Sinha††
Madras High Court granted interim relief to Viacom 18, as it has made out a prima facie case on merits and the balance of convenience was also in its favour.
It is shocking, rather a mind-blowing fact that many innocent persons are victims of false implication under the SC/ST Act
Uttaranchal High Court: While allowing the revision petitions, the single judge bench of Ravindra Maithani, J. has held that Sessions
Madras High Court: In an application filed by Viacom 18 praying for restraining several cable and internet service providers involved
Punjab and Haryana High Court: Gurvinder Singh Gill, J. allowed the anticipatory bail petition in a suicide case. A petition was filed
Gujarat High Court: Dr A.P. Thaker, J. passed an order to grant anticipatory bail for the offences punishable under Section 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v-a)
Karnataka High Court: While deciding a criminal petition filed under Section 439 of CrPC, a Single Judge Bench of Budihal R.B., J.