Sentencing in Indian Penal System: Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
by Sanjay Vashishtha†
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 31
by Sanjay Vashishtha†
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 31
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Government’s notification which allowed the Sikh travellers to carry a Kirpan on their person while on domestic flights. The Court further held that the notification was issued after due deliberations and the issue raised was entirely a matter of policy decision.
by Dr Puneet Pathak†
Madras High Court: In a case filed by the petitioner- candidate seeking the reason for his non-selection as well as
Gauhati High Court: While deciding this interesting writ petition praying for the issuance of the writ of Mandamus directing to
Court of Justice of the European Union (Second Chamber): In the instant dispute before the CJEU wherein the applicant's internship
Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While deciding the instant appeal directed against the decision of the Single Judge Bench in
Supreme Court of The United States: While deliberating upon the instant matter, wherein the petitioner lost his job as a high school
Madras High Court: Expressing that, the right of worship guaranteed under the Constitution to be respected by all concerned and devotees cannot
Supreme Court of The United States: While deciding the instant issue related to the First Amendment, the SCOTUS Justices had to decide
Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Brij Raj Singh and Ramesh Sinha, JJ. dismissed a criminal appeal which was filed under
As the proceedings in #hijabrow continue in Karnataka High Court, we bring you another interesting decision from Foreign Court, wherein the Federal
Karnataka High Court: While expressing that, “Endless agitations and closure of educational institutions indefinitely are not happy things to happen”, the Bench
Kerala High Court: The Bench of P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J., stayed the release of Malyalam film “Aquarium “apprehending it to be defamatory to
Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of S.C. Gupte and Abhay Ahuja, JJ., permitted the distribution of Ayambil food to be served
Calcutta High Court: The Division Bench of Sanjib Banerjee and Arijit Banerjee, JJ., observed that an adult woman is free to marry the
Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Pankaj Naqvi and Vivek Agarwal, JJ., directed for no coercive action to be taken against a
Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of S. Sujatha and Sachin Shankar Magadam JJ., disposed off the petition due to the limitation
“Marriage conducted for the sole purpose of Unlawful Conversion or vice-versa to be declared void.”
Supreme Court: While stating that the Jharkhand High Court has rightly ordered that Shravani Puja cannot be held holding big congregation fair