Delhi High Court denies Nokia’s plea of directing Oppo to pay royalty to Nokia under Order 39 Rule 10 CPC in Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) case
Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed by Nokia under Order 39 Rule 10 of CPC, the
Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed by Nokia under Order 39 Rule 10 of CPC, the
Madras High Court: A Division Bench of R Mahadevan and Sathya Narayan Prasad, JJ. dismissed the tax appeal holding that guarantee commission
by Dr Srikant Parthasarathy† and Dr Amirthalakshmi R††
Bombay High Court: G.S. Patel, J., while addressing a matter wherein the offence of defamation has been alleged, expressed: Simply using another’s
DTAA provisions must be treated as law and followed by Indian courts, notwithstanding what may be contained in the Income Tax Act to the contrary, unless more beneficial to the assessee.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT): A two-member Bench of Saktijit Dey, Judicial Member and Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Accountant Member, allowed the appeal
Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before a Division Bench of S.C. Sharma and Virender Singh, JJ., against the order