Section 7
No prohibition on advocate to represent different company in separate proceedings filed under Section 7 IBC: NCLAT
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal: While dealing with a matter seeking expunging the adverse remake made against the appellant, a
NCLAT | On not finding flaws in the NCLT order, abstains from interfering- Petitioner not being authorised under S.7 IBC, lacks locus standi
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)- The Coram of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain (Judicial Member), Ashok Kumar Mishra (Technical Member), and Alok
Section 7(4)(C) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 : Acquiesence by Silence?
by M. Dhyan Chinnappa† and Rohan Tigadi††
NCLAT: ‘Moratorium’ will not affect any suit or case pending before Supreme Court u/Art. 32 or any High Court u/Art. 226
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal: Canara Bank, the appellant-financial creditor, challenged the impugned order passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench whereby
NCLT admits Bank of Baroda’s insolvency plea against Amrapali Silicon City Pvt. Ltd.; appoints Interim Resolution Professional
National Company Law Tribunal, Principal Bench: Bank of Baroda, the Financial Creditor filed an application to trigger the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process