madras high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court said that after divorce when the spouses have ceased to be husband and wife, proprietary right of both the spouses also get affected.

unregistered agreement to sell as evidence
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court said that as per proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908 an unregistered document affecting immovable property may be received as evidence of a contract in a suit for specific performance under Chapter-II of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, or as evidence of any collateral transaction not required to be effected by registered instrument, subject to Section 17(1A) of the Registration Act.

Abatement of suit
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Placing its reliance on Bhurey Khan v Yaseen Khan 1995 Supp (3) SCC 331, the Bench stated that the suit will not abate for the reason of non-substitution of all legal representatives of the deceased if the suit was substantially represented.

Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court held that once loan is repaid, the bank is not entitled to withhold the title deed merely on the grounds that the petitioner has transferred the property during the subsistence of mortgage.

District Court, Gurgaon
Case BriefsDistrict Court

While dealing with a suit for execution of sale deed of property filed in 2014, which was allegedly bought in 1992 through oral agreement, the Gurgaon District Court found the same based on forged and fabricated documents and refused to allow the claim.

Case BriefsSupreme Court

In a suit property where father executed a release deed for relinquishment of rights for valuable consideration, Supreme Court held that the effect of principle of estoppel cannot be warded off by appellants claiming through their father whose conduct generated this estoppel.

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court said that Rule 55-A is delegated legislation which cannot go beyond the scope of the Parent Act viz., the Registration Act as well the Transfer of Property Act which is the substantive law governing the transfer of immovable properties. Hence, it is held that the first proviso is clearly ultra vires and unconstitutional.

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court upheld the Himachal Pradesh High Court’s order holding the respondent as the owner of the encroached land, as an encroacher cannot claim benefit of Section 51 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

Transfer of Property Act
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Rakshit Agarwal†

Case BriefsSupreme Court

    Supreme Court: In an appeal against the judgment passed by the Kerala High Court, wherein it has set aside the

Akaant MittalExperts Corner

by Akaant Kumar Mittal†

Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 78

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Dinesh Maheshwari* and Aniruddha Bose, JJ., held that in cases disclosing deliberate defiance and elective non-performance

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J., passed a decree for recovery of possession in favour of the plaintiffs without a trial,

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: A.K. Menon, J., addressed a matter wherein an arrangement was executed between the parties for taking care of the

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Achal Gupta*

Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A very efficacious, substantive and procedural mechanism to facilitate the realisation of deserving and intrinsic value of encumbered estates and other immovable

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Akshit Sachdeva*

COVID 19Op EdsOP. ED.

by Ramchandra Madan*

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Sangeet Lodha and Mahendar Kumar Goyal, JJ. dismissed an appeal regarding irregularity of a suit

OP. ED.Practical Lawyer Archives

Bhumesh Verma, Managing Partner and
Abhisar Vidyarthi, Student Researcher, Corp Comm Legal

Cite as: (2019) PL (CL) June 74