Bom HC | An unsatisfied order/Judgment in personam is no bar to proceedings in rem
Bombay High Court: R.I. Chagla, J., while addressing a matter held that, “Cause of action in rem does not merge with the Order
Claim
Jhar HC | In the matter of compassionate appointment, it is essential to show that the candidate has a better claim than others
Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Aparesh Kumar Singh and Kailash Prasad Deo, JJ. dismissed the writ petition being devoid of
SL SC | Legal representative has the right to continue the suit but he cannot claim anything for which the original plaintiff was not entitled
Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: Full Bench of Buwaneka Aluwihare, Vijith K. Malalgoda, and S. Thurairaja, JJ.
Bom HC | A son, who had been given in adoption, cannot claim partition in property of his real father
Bombay High Court: M.G. Giratkar, J. dismissed a second appeal filed against the judgments of the lower courts wherein the partition suit brought by
Jhar HC | S. 18(6) of JVAT Act, 2005 does not contemplate production of JVAT-404 Forms as a mandatory condition for availing benefit of ITC
Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of H.C. Mishra and Deepak Roshan, JJ., set aside the impugned orders and directed the Assessing Authority
Pat HC | Special Leave disallowed when Trial Court reviewed all necessary aspects of the case
Patna High Court: Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J. disposed of the writ petition saying that the final decision regarding the petitioner’s claim rested
Jhar HC | Illiterate person, unable to understand legal impediment cannot be denied claim solely on the ground of delay
Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. contemplated the mercy petition filed by a petitioner who sought re-employment in a Coal Company.
AFT | Claim for pension is based on continuing wrong, and relief can be granted if such continuing wrong creates a continuing source of injury
Armed Forces Tribunal: A Coram of Justice SVS Rathore (Judicial Member) and Air Marshal BBP Sinha (Administrative Member) allowed an ex-hawaldar’s application
Bom HC | No right to claim interim relief to continue business on basis of expired license
Bombay High Court: M.S. Sonak, J. while disposing of a petition filed by eatery owners whose licences have been cancelled, directed the
SA HC | Assessing the quantum of the claim not disabled by the amendment of particulars, objection dismissed
High Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Local Division: This application was filed before G.J. Gajjar, AJ., under Rule 28(4) of the
NCDRC | Claim for insurance not maintainable where the insured does not prescribe to the terms of insurance policy
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Justice V.K. Jain (Presiding Member) dismissed an appeal filed by a jeweller, assailing repudiation of his
Utt HC | Authorities cannot be allowed to read something between the lines, which is not even a part of the Regulation
Uttaranchal High Court: A Bench of Manoj K. Tiwari, J. while allowing the petition quashed the order of the Chief Education Officer.
AFT | Claim for family pension not maintainable if name of applicant not mentioned in service records of the deceased soldier
Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT): The Bench of S.V.S. Rathore, J. and Lt. General N.B. Singh (Member) dismissed an application challenging the denial of
AFT | 44 years delay, primary reason for destruction of Medical Board proceedings, claim for pension denied
Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT): The Bench of S.V.S. Rathore, J. and Air Marshal BBP Sinha; Members, dismissed an application claiming disability pension,
AFT | Claim for pension not admissible when a person is dismissed under the provisions of Army Act
Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT): The Bench of S.V.S. Rathore, J. and Air Marshal BBP Sinha (Member) dismissed a Lance Naik’s claim for
Megh HC | Claim for compassionate appointment loses significance where family has survived for 18 years without same
Meghalaya High Court: Yaqoob Mir, CJ dismissed a petition for compassionate appointment holding it to be without merits. Petitioner’s father was in Meghalaya
NCLAT | Parties may settle the claim in interregnum of filing of application under S. 7 IBC and constitution of Committee of Creditors
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) allowed an
P&H HC | Person governed by one set of rules and regulations cannot claim benefit of promotion under another rule
Punjab and Haryana High Court: The petition was filed before a Division Bench of Rajiv Sharma and Harinder Singh Sidhu, JJ. against
P&H HC | Claim of fraudulently obtaining signature on agreement to sell must be supported with sufficient evidence
Punjab & Haryana HC: The Bench of Raj Mohan Singh, J. dismissed a revision petition on the ground of insufficient evidence but
Claim already raised before competent court not to be interfered by High Court especially when no ground for the same is found
Madhya Pradesh High Court: This writ was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Sheel Nagu, J., in nature of mandamus. The