Exclusive jurisdiction clause indicates seat of arbitration
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court dismissed a special leave petition challenging the Delhi High Court’s order appointing a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court upheld the view that an exclusive jurisdiction clause, in the context of arbitration proceedings, can be construed as indicative of the seat of arbitration.

Continue reading
NEET Paper Leak Protest Proceedings
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court directed that all CCTV footage, drone footage, body-worn camera recordings, videography, wireless communication records, and PCR lodge collections related to the students’ protest be preserved.

Continue reading
Conditions for police custody
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court modified the impugned condition and directed that an advocate would be permitted to remain at a place from where he could see the respondent but would not be permitted to intervene in the investigation “at any cost”.

Continue reading
Supreme Court video recording ban
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Supreme Court on 24 July 2026 issued interim order prohibiting monetisation, posting, re-posting, uploading, transmitting, modification etc., of recording of judicial proceedings in light of concerns raised by the petitioner over selective circulation of clipped, edited, and decontextualised portions of court hearings on social media platforms.

Continue reading
Motor Vehicles Act causal link
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court held that although the expression “arising out of” receives a broad interpretation and compensation proceedings are governed by the standard of preponderance of probabilities, the existence of some link whatsoever between the car, and the death had to be established.

Continue reading
Raja Raghuvanshi Murder case
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court observed that although bail is the rule and jail the exception, and every accused is entitled to the presumption of innocence, the present case stood on a different footing as the earlier orders rejecting the respondent’s bail on merits had attained finality and the trial had already commenced.

Continue reading
Section 340 CrPC wrong statement false statement
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Supreme Court while quashing criminal proceedings under Section 340 CrPC against a litigant and his counsel held that “wrong statement” is not the same as a “false statement”. The Court reiterated that prosecution can be initiated only where a prima facie case of deliberate falsehood exists and the Court records that such action is expedient in the interests of justice.

Continue reading
JJ Act Preliminary Assessment
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court held that while conducting preliminary assessment, Juvenile Justice Board was not bound by any opinion or recommendation and must independently apply its mind to all the material available to it, including Social Background Report, Social Investigation Report, witness statements, interaction with the child and every other relevant circumstance.

Continue reading
Section 66 IT Act bailable offence
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court sets aside the order which treated Section 66 as a non-bailable offence while ignoring Section 77-B

Continue reading
phone calls criminal conspiracy proof
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court held that while frequent phone calls alone cannot establish criminal conspiracy, a complete and unbroken chain of circumstantial evidence, including recoveries admissible under Section 27, Evidence Act, and the accused’s conduct was sufficient to uphold the husband’s conviction for the premeditated murder of his wife.

Continue reading
SC modifies gang rape sentence
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Upholding the appellant’s conviction for gang rape, the Court modified the sentence from imprisonment for the remainder of natural life to 20 years’ rigorous imprisonment with the benefit of remission after considering his young age, absence of criminal antecedents, satisfactory conduct in prison and the possibility of reformation.

Continue reading
Railway liability for shortage of goods booked at owner's risk
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Supreme Court held that Railways cannot be held liable for shortage of goods booked at “owner’s risk” unless negligence or misconduct is proved under Section 97, Railways Act, 1989. The Court clarified the burden of proof under Section 65(2) and dismissed the compensation claim.

Continue reading
Absence of railway ticket cannot negate bona fide passenger status
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court advised the Indian Railways to adopt effective measures to address overcrowding in trains, observing that overcrowding frequently results in passengers falling from moving trains and suffering fatal injuries.

Continue reading
DRT Recovery Certificate Not a Decree
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court stated that the 2016 Amendment to the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 had created a legal fiction operating prospectively and did not affect proceedings instituted before its enactment.

Continue reading
Supreme Court bail forged Power of Attorney
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court granted bail the appellant, who was alleged to be an attesting witness to a forged Power of Attorney and subsequent sale deeds, after over 11 months of incarceration.

Continue reading
elderly prisoners release
Case BriefsSupreme Court

While issuing comprehensive directions, the Court noted that these proceedings called for a systemic recalibration of criminal justice system, wherein vulnerability is not treated as an afterthought, but as a constitutionally significant determinant for humane treatment of prisoners.

Continue reading
Supreme Court imposes ₹ 3 lakh costs on Samay Raina
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court imposed ₹3 lakh costs each on Samay Raina, Vipul Goyal and others for alleged brazen violation of undertakings and directed them to file compliance affidavits within 15 days.

Continue reading
Article 227 challenge to Section 16 application
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Reiterating the legislative policy of minimal judicial interference in arbitral proceedings, the Court observed that interference under Article 227 is warranted only in rare cases involving a patent lack of inherent jurisdiction that is apparent on the face of the record

Continue reading
Section 22 Hindu Succession Act Agricultural Property
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Justice N. Kotiswar Singh, concurring with Justice Sanjay Karol, stated that “the right of pre-emption as conferred under Section 22 of the HSA is, in its pith and substance, an incident of succession and nothing more”.

Continue reading