Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief to LinkedIn India and its Directors by staying ROC penalty orders passed for alleged non-compliance with SBO disclosure norms under Sections 89 and 90, Companies Act, 2013.
“Substantial amount of money is spent by producers and those involved in such creative works, and staying the release of such films/web-series would cause immense loss to all those involved in it.”
As an interim measure, the Court restrained the DCP from proceeding further in the matter till the next date of hearing.
The instant matter pertains to issuance of demolition notices by Bijainagar Municipality to the petitioners, following the arrest of certain accused individuals from their families allegedly involved in sexually exploiting minor girls.
The Registrar directed the law student to vacate the hostel accommodation on the Student Disciplinary Committee’s recommendations due to non-cooperation in the inquiry.
The petitioners alleged that the objections were decided without affording them a proper opportunity of hearing, relying solely on a newspaper notice.
The petitioner’s license was suspended based on inspection by the National Child Protection Commission disclosing employment of 59 minor children.
The residents of Odwada village in Jalore district faced an anti-encroachment drive on a 35-acre piece of pasture land, following Court’s previous order directing removal of encroachments from the government pasture land.
In the instant matter, the petitioner had filed a motion challenging the cancellation of the appointment and sought a stay due to violation of Section 7 of the Rajasthan Madrasa Board Act, 2020.
It is clarified that this order does not amount to acquittal but is merely suspension of conviction in peculiar circumstances of the case including the long political career of appellant and his age.
Calcutta High Court acknowledged the concerns raised by the petitioner regarding the potential harm caused by the notification to the affected dog breeds.
“NewsClick’s plea of financial stringency based on its balance-sheet inspires no confidence as according to the Assessing Officer the accounts have not been properly maintained.”
“The trade marks POLO/RALPH LAUREN/POLO PLAYER DEVICE are liable to be recognized as ‘well-known’ marks as defined under Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.”
“The Supreme Court has declined to stay the Order dated 05-07-2023. Therefore, propriety demands that this Court ought not have passed any interim order which had the effect of staying the Order dated 05-07-2023 and other consequential orders.”
The Sabhapati (Chairperson) of the Panchayat Sthayee Samity is in custody due to a false criminal case and 6 other members are named in an FIR and are currently evading arrest.
Rahul Gandhi was sentenced to two years imprisonment for offence under Sections 499 and 500 of IPC for his ‘all thieves have Modi surname’ remark.
Calcutta High Court: Shekhar B. Saraf, J. upheld the award granted by the Arbitral Tribunal holding that the award holder
Supreme Court: After listing the Jahangirpuri demolition drive case for hearing on Thursday i.e. 21.04.2022, the 3-judge bench of NV Ramana, CJ
Supreme Court: Explaining the scope of Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna,
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) -The Coram of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain and Alok Srivastava, Technical Member while deciding an appeal