NCLAT Archives | Page 6 of 9

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Insolvency for Individuals & Partnership Firms | Is it proper for NCLT to record finding regarding default when RP is yet to consider it and submit report? NCLAT discusses Ss. 95, 97, 99 IBC

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT): Coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Justice Jarat Kumar Jain, Judicial Member and

Akaant Mittal Experts Corner

Whether a Decree or an Arbitral Award or a Settlement Deed can form the Basis of a Financial or Operational Debt under IB Code

by Akaant Kumar Mittal†

Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 1

Case Briefs Supreme Court

“NCLT can encourage settlements, it cannot direct it by acting as courts of equity” SC holds NCLT has limited powers to either admit or reject an application u/s 7(5) of IBC

Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud* and A S Bopanna, JJ., held that the powers of NCLT

Op Eds OP. ED.

Hunch to Preserve the Telecom Sector Becomes a Window to Sabotage Concluded Resolution Processes

by Anurag Tripathi* and Naman Singh Bagga**

Case Briefs Supreme Court

“Any deviation would defeat the object and purpose of providing such time limit under IBC”; Supreme Court directs to speed up insolvency process of Amtek Auto

Supreme Court: The Division Bench of M.R. Shah* and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ., directed to speed up the insolvency resolution process of Amtek

Case Briefs Supreme Court

Can NCLT entertain an arbitrable dispute? SC sets the yardsticks of residuary powers of NCLT under IBC

“The residuary jurisdiction of the NCLT cannot be invoked if the termination of a contract is based on grounds unrelated to the insolvency of the Corporate Debtor.”

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT | Existence of Dispute prior to issuance of Demand Notice-NCLT and NCLAT in rhythm, rejects appeal

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Coram of Ashok Bhushan, J (Chairperson), Jarat Kumar Jain, J (Judicial) and Dr Ashok Kumar

Op Eds OP. ED.

Decoding the Conundrum around the Retrospective Effect of Section 29-A IBC through the Evolution of the Famous Wig Associates Judgment

by Shuchi Sejwar† and Sanjana Sachdeva[*]

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT| Finds raising a late ‘pre-existing dispute’, spurious and to avoid action under IBC| Denies to stay CIRP

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) -The Coram of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain and Alok Srivastava, Technical Member while deciding an appeal

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT | ‘Unhesitatingly’ decides the ‘unsustainability’| Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties| Held: ‘Controlling by votes’ is ‘Controlling interest’

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal-The Coram of Justice M. Venugopal, Acting Chairperson and Kanthi Narahari, Technical Member while concurring with the adjudicating

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT | On not finding flaws in the NCLT order, abstains from interfering- Petitioner not being authorised under S.7 IBC, lacks locus standi

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)- The Coram of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain (Judicial Member), Ashok Kumar Mishra (Technical Member), and Alok

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT | In last meeting of CoC, unreasonable pushed in ‘success fee’ appears like an afterthought-Affirms proportionate distribution

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice A.I.S. Cheema, Officiating Chairperson and Alok Srivastava, Technical Member while dismissing an

Case Briefs Supreme Court

Supreme Court on preferring an appeal before NCLAT beyond a period of 30 days: Read the Law [Explained]

Supreme Court of India: The Bench of M.R. Shah and Aniruddha Bose, JJ., observed that, “Appellate Tribunal has jurisdiction or power to

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT | Refusal to sign Form FA- A material irregularity but the other relevant considerations to not initiate CIRP gains primacy-Abuse of process obviated

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain, Judicial Member and Dr Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT | Intention of Legislature, deliberation of the Adjudicating Authority | Only permits Suspended Management of the CD to submit viable RP-Affirms

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain, Judicial Member and Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member, dismissed

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT | ‘Till further orders’, not in order — No bar in merging unhealthy company with healthy company to succour

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain, Judicial Member and Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member while

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT | Matter getting protracted, defeating the purpose of IBC; Orders NCLT to pass orders ‘one way or the other’

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Coram of Judicial A.I.S. Cheema (The officiating Chairperson) and Dr Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) while

Case Briefs Supreme Court

Supreme Court on Jurisdiction of NCLAT & NCLT || Does jurisdiction of NCLAT/NCLT extend into entering upon merits of a business decision made by a requisite majority of CoC?

Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and M R Shah, JJ., observed that, Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority

Case Briefs Supreme Court

No bar to amendment of S. 7 IBC petition until final order; Money decree, recovery certificate in financial creditor’s favour gives fresh cause of action to initiate corporate insolvency resolution process: SC

Supreme Court: A Division Bench of Indira Banerjee and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ. held that there is no bar in law to amendment

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT | An Arroyo for OYO | While allowing it to work independently, closed insolvency proceedings; Disallowed external parties to impinge

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Coram of Anant Bijay Singh, J. (Judicial Member) and Shreesha Merla (Technical Member) while allowing