Whether the findings of the Supreme Court were binding onthe Single Judge under Article 141 and 144 Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Print (Opens in new window) Print Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Published on April 1, 2023October 16, 2025By Bhumika Indulia Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Print (Opens in new window) Print Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Related Leave a comment
Case Briefs, High Courts ‘AMPT Road to be in top condition’; Meghalaya HC directs State PWD to undertake complete overhauling
Law School News, Moot Court Announcements School of Law LPU | “Gavelled “4th Moot Court Competition, 2022 [10-11 November, 2022]
Law School News, Others ILS | Post Graduate Diploma on Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods (ADRMs) 2022-23
Case Briefs, High Courts Tenant can’t dispute admitted tenant-landlord relationship by plea of oral sale; Delhi HC upholds eviction on Bona fide requirement
Case Briefs, High Courts Madras HC: Procedural irregularity in affidavit filing doesn’t justify abandonment of Modern Kitchens’ trade mark application by Registrar
Law made Easy 50 years of the unprecedented case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala and the ‘Doctrine of Basic Structure’